"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> By the same reasoning, is_convertible<void(), void(*)()> should evaluate
> to
>> true, since a function type is implicitly convertible to its pointer type.
>> But given the current implementation (1.29.0),
>> is_convertible<void(),void(*)()> doesn't compile.
>>
>> Opinions? Is this just too nit-picky?
>
> You're probably right, I guess we should convert non-object types to
> references internally so that cases like this will actually compile.
John, do you intend to follow up on these? I'm just asking because
I'm a little unclear on the assignment of maintenance responsibility
for type_traits at the moment.
Thanks,
Dave
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
