David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message | > 000d01c2c6f3$85038c30$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:000d01c2c6f3$85038c30$1d00a8c0@pdimov2... | >> [...] | >> By the way, the current typedef template proposal prohibits deduction; | >> this makes it less attractive for creating subpointers. | > | > Ouch! Is this due to complexity issues, or was it just not deemed useful?? | | It's hard to say why, exactly, but my sense of it was that it was done | because it was easy to specify semantics that were identical to those | of the existing metafunction-form workaround.
My recollection is a little different :-) -- Gaby _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
