Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | > "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> | > 000d01c2c6f3$85038c30$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:000d01c2c6f3$85038c30$1d00a8c0@pdimov2...
> | >> [...]
> | >> By the way, the current typedef template proposal prohibits deduction;
> | >> this makes it less attractive for creating subpointers.
> | >
> | > Ouch! Is this due to complexity issues, or was it just not deemed useful??
> |
> | It's hard to say why, exactly, but my sense of it was that it was done
> | because it was easy to specify semantics that were identical to those
> | of the existing metafunction-form workaround.
>
> My recollection is a little different :-)
Are you planning to grace us with the contents of your memory, Gaby,
or are you gonna hold us in suspense forever? :-)
come-up-to-the-lab-and-see-what's-on-the-slab-ly y'rs,
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
