> I've always felt that is_base_and_derived is a funny name. is_base_of<B, D> > and is_derived_from<D, B> both look pronounceable(sp?) to me: "is B a base > of D? is D derived from B?" > > While we're at it, is the final verdict that is_base_and_derived<void, X> > should be false? What about is_base_and_derived<void, void>?
The LWG suggested (and I agreed with) a change to "is_base". And yes, if one or the other template arguments are non-class types, then the answer is false (I may need to double check the current implementation on this). John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
