David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't judge that part, but I can say that this is an incredibly useful thing
> to do, as hinted at near the bottom of
> http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/008.htm (search for "base class"). It's one
> reason my implementation of an exception-safe STL was a lot cleaner
> (and more-correct) than the original SGI implementation was.
I guess I should clarify that my implementation came first, and SGI
followed without using "my" base class technique... until they
eventually got hip to it.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
