"David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message b1ehpj$j1n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:b1ehpj$j1n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Actually, you can control mixing by determining which policies can be > constructed from which other policies. I just didn't know if it was a > good idea to let users freely mix auto_ptr with shared_ptr. But I > suppose if they get an auto_ptr from legacy code, and they want it to be > managed by shared_ptr, that is a legitimate use.
Indeed. Having policies decide which way, if at all, they plan to interoperate, is imho a key strenght of pbd. Most ownership policies should accept the destructive copy policy. Andrei _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
