From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> That very nicely clarifies the requirements. I don't have time to munch on
> a detailed solution, but let me add this: operator[] doesn't have to be a
> member, which might simplify things considerably.

Nope, it "shall be a non-static member function", see 13.5.5/1. Yes, I think
that the restriction is pointless, too.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to