At 07:25 PM 2/4/2003, Paul Mensonides wrote: >... > >If an implicit conversion to the pointed-to type is provided, there is no need to >overload the subscript operator: > >... > >The same applies to the standing problem of operator->*(). > >2c.
Yep. More reasons why I prefer that smart pointers have an operator T*. But my view has always been a minority opinion, in this as in so many other things. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
