> void checkMyObject(MyObject* my, int context, int a, int b, int c)
> {
> BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_MESSAGE(my->getA(), a, context);
> BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_MESSAGE(my->getB(), b, context);
> BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL_MESSAGE(my->getC(), c, context);
> }
>
> MyObject* my1 = new MyObject(1, 2, 3);
> checkMyObject(my1, __LINE__, 1, 2, 3);
> MyObject* my2 = new MyObject(4, 5, 6);
> checkMyObject(my2, __LINE__, 4, 5, 6);
I believe that message provided by BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL is more valuable, cause
it gives the mismatched values.
When you run in this kind of the situation I would recommend:
1. Use macro instead of function
#define CHECK_MY_OBJECT( obj, vA, vB, vC ) \
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(obj->getA(), v1); \
....
This way want loose line information.
2. use BOOST_MESSAGE tool
void checkMyObject(MyObject* my, int context, int a, int b, int c, size_t
source_line)
{
BOOST_MESSAGE( "Testing " << my->some_kind_of_object_identification() );
// or
BOOST_MESSAGE( "Perform check on line: " << source_line );
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(my->getA(), a);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(my->getB(), b);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(my->getC(), c);
}
Regards,
Gennadiy.
P.S. Don't forget to set log level to "messages" would you decide to choose
the second solution.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
