> I've a similiar problem with BOOST_CHECK family, but I think > the solution > can be different: provide a means to convert failed test into > assertion > failure. This way I can conveniently debug. Currently, I have to > replace BOOST_CHECK with assert manually, to find where the > failure happened. > Gennadiy, what do you think? > > - Volodya
I do not understand exactly how switching to assert would help you locate the failure point. If you going to run it under debugger you as well could just set a break point on failed assertion. If you going to analize the core using debugger, why not run it under debugger in a first place. If you expect to get a location from the assert output - it will be not better than test tools one. Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
