dlux42 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what if you use the deallocator as a template parameter? > > + It does not cost extra space > + Don't need to use an extra reference-counted pointer > - The interface is not consistent with shared_ptr > > How about that? I would be happy to see this advancement in the > scoped_ptr class. > > Anyway: Do you know any smart-pointer class, which supports custom > deallocator and can transfer ownership? (auto_ptr does not support > custom deallocator and either smart_ptr or shared_ptr does not support > release() method).
Both good questions. Do we have an answer? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
