"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Curiosity got the better of me, and I did an experimental run on build > 2292. > > Looks pretty good. A vast improvement over prior releases. Problems noted: > > * Missing overloads for long long. > * boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp line 153 giving it fits. > * A few other scattered failures on code working for other compilers. > > I'm not going to post the results; no point in worrying about workarounds > until we see what the actual shipped version does.
I have the RC1 version, build 2346. Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to run the regression tests on any regular basis. Hopefully someone else with build 2292 or 2346 can run them at least now & then. >From what I recall from earlier testing, most of the problems with this compiler stem from workarounds put in for earlier VC versions that aren't disabled for _MSC_VER >= 0x1310. -cd _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
