bjam "-sTOOLS=vc7 msvc vc71" >bjam.log
I get 32 things which fail:
...failed updating 36 targets...
...skipped 36 targets...
...updated 852 targets...
from the most recent run (8 hours ago).
all of the errors seem to be triggered by this:
vc-Link libs\signals\build\bin\boost_signals.dll\vc71\release\runtime-link-dynamic\boost_signals.dll libs\signals\build\bin\boost_signals.dll\vc71\release\runtime-link-dynamic\boost_signals.lib
Creating library libs\signals\build\bin\boost_signals.dll\vc71\release\runtime-link-dynamic\boost_signals.lib and object libs\signals\build\bin\boost_signals.dll\vc71\release\runtime-link-dynamic\boost_signals.exp
vc-Link libs\test\build\bin\boost_prg_exec_monitor.dll\vc7\debug\runtime-link-static\threading-single\boost_prg_exec_monitor.dll libs\test\build\bin\boost_prg_exec_monitor.dll\vc7\debug\runtime-link-static\threading-single\boost_prg_exec_monitor.lib
cpp_main.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "int __cdecl cpp_main(int,char * * const)" (?cpp_main@@YAHHQAPAD@Z) referenced in function "public: virtual int __thiscall `anonymous namespace'::cpp_main_caller::function(void)" (?function@cpp_main_caller@?A0xb7c10447@@UAEHXZ)
libs\test\build\bin\boost_prg_exec_monitor.dll\vc7\debug\runtime-link-static\threading-single\boost_prg_exec_monitor.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Any suggestions on fixing this would be helpful, and then what do I do to actually run the regressions tests?
At Sunday 2003/02/16 06:15, you wrote:
At 11:21 PM 2/15/2003, Carl Daniel wrote:
>"Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> This morning's Win32 regression tests have been posted. Looking at the
>> diff, http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html,
>> there are still some worries:
>
>An aside -
>
>Since 1.30.0 will likely be the Boost version when MSVC 7.1 ("Everett")
>ships, it would be nice to have VC7.1 regression results. I can
>understand perhaps not posting 7.1 results until the RTM version is
>available, but is anyone even running the regression tests on the "final
>beta" (build 2292) or "RC1" (build 2346) versions regularly?
I considered that briefly, but decided not to pursue it for several reasons.
The Win32 regression testing is already sucking up too much of my time and my computer's time. Every added compiler makes that worse. And changing the setup so close to the Boost release doesn't seem smart to me. The Boost policy not to test betas is probably a good one, too.
I'll add VC++ 7.1 as soon as possible once I get a release copy, but have no idea when that will be.
However, if you wanted to start running VC++ 7.1 regression tests now, and posting them as a separate set of tables, that would be fine with me.
--Beman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
