"Itay Maman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... "David B. Held" wrote: > > [...] > > template <typename T> > > void operator()(const T& operand) const > > { > > operand.~T(); > > } > > [...] > > Is the destructor really a const function? > > The object being destroyed is the formal parameter "operand". > The object whose operator() is called is not changed at all, thus > the 'const' qualification is in place.
I realize that the operator ought to be const. But should the reference be? I guess I don't know if you should be able to call a d'tor on a const& or not. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
