Gennadiy Rozental wrote: > > Eric Friedman wrote: > > > > > >> The area would be helped by renaming extract to access. > > > > > > I tend to agree the name is confusing. So shall we call it > > > boost::access<>? Input? > > what about get_value<>?
If extract<> returned a value, I don't think we'd be having this conversation. If anything, your proposal should be to call it get_reference<>, but I personally find that neither attractive nor particularly clear. Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
