Robert Allan Schwartz wrote: >>> I believe a "standardized" (within Boost), portable, and *readable* >>> text representation of T makes my proposal better than typeid(). >> >> I think if readability is the main criterion we'd do much better to >> invest in decoding the typeids generated by GCC. I believe there's >> even a library that comes with it that does that job. > > Why should millions of programmers have to make that "invest"ment? > > Wouldn't it be better if gcc simply generated better type names?
Sure, if there existed an unambiguous definition of "better type name". _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
