Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote: > As of about 3pm PST today the RC_1_30_0 branch is still broken under VC6 and > 7.0: > > http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047771420/dailylog_win32_vc60_test > http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047771420/dailylog_win32_vc70_test
It's not still, it's again :(. The above failures are due to 'is_class' being broken for reference types, on compilers without partial specialization support (the type traits is_class test fails as well). The change at fault - http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/boost/boost/boost/type_traits /is_class.hpp.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6 - is commented as "Sunpro can't cope with latest is_base_and_derived implementation added gcc warning suppression to is_class" which doesn't really match with what the diff shows. It would be great if John shed some light on it, although I am pretty sure the right fix is to revert to the 1.5 revision. Aleksey _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
