>On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:34:18 -0500, Beman Dawes wrote >> I'll go over the do-list again after dinner, but it looks like >> almost all problems have been cleared except for this one. > >I don't know if the Linux results are up to date, but >it appears that we have still taken a step backward with >lexical cast on gcc 2.95.3. This is causing a large number >date_time tests which compiled and executed correctly with >the 1.29 release to fail. > >Without actually looking at the source it would be my >guess that this is related to the fact that the 2.95.3 >standard library only supported old iostreams and that >somehow the lexical_cast work around got lost in the >changes. This is supported by the fact that the same >tests work fine with STLPort. It would be nice if this >workaround could be restored before the release even if >results in the 2.95.3 version having the 'string' bug. >I've attached the details for reference...
OK, lexical_cast goes back on the list.
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
