Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
And I'd prefer to have a separator for the non-releases like the '-' anywhere:
v1_30-branch v1_30_0-rc1 v1_30_0 v1_30_1-rc1 v1_30_1-rc2 v1_30_1
Why?
Nothing technical / serious. Just my personal taste, yours may vary :) Anything without a '-' marks a real release
[Cut&paste from your second post:] > I'm even inclined to do as other projects do and kill all the > underscores, waiting to deal with ambiguity until it arises. It's > going to be a *long* time before we have numbers that could conflict.
Short (or should I say: too short) labels will buy us nothing IMHO. Is there any reason for as-short-as-possible labels? I just tried to create a non-breaking, readable naming scheme which reflects the current use of branches and tags, but I don't have any strong feelings about whether it should be used or not...
Regards, Daniel
-- Daniel Frey
aixigo AG - financial training, research and technology Schloß-Rahe-Straße 15, 52072 Aachen, Germany fon: +49 (0)241 936737-42, fax: +49 (0)241 936737-99 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], web: http://www.aixigo.de
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
