Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Cut&paste from your second post:] > > I'm even inclined to do as other projects do and kill all the > > underscores, waiting to deal with ambiguity until it arises. It's > > going to be a *long* time before we have numbers that could conflict. > > Short (or should I say: too short) labels will buy us nothing IMHO. Is > there any reason for as-short-as-possible labels? I just tried to > create a non-breaking, readable naming scheme which reflects the > current use of branches and tags, but I don't have any strong feelings > about whether it should be used or not...
Me neither. I take it back. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
