"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > I think I like this enhanced version. > 'max_size_type_that_fit_in_padding' > must better be one of the intergral types > to make easy and safe to use, so I guess that > there might ocurr that some bits > are wasted anyway.
Why couldn't it be a char[]? Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
