David B. Held wrote: > "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [...] >> I think I like this enhanced version. >> 'max_size_type_that_fit_in_padding' >> must better be one of the intergral types >> to make easy and safe to use, so I guess that >> there might ocurr that some bits >> are wasted anyway. > > Why couldn't it be a char[]?
char[] makes sense. Add a tag_size constant int and we're in business :-) -- Joel de Guzman joel at boost-consulting.com http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
