On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:49 am, Vladimir Prus wrote: > I've put together a plan of post-review developement of the program_options > library --- see attachemnt. I believe it includes all issues raised. If > anybody mage a suggestion which got lost, or has any opinion on the > document, I'd be interested to know. >
Postional parameters looks like an interesting addition. I guess this is what is commonly called "non-option arguments"? Will non-option arguments be able to be placed anywhere on command line, like gnu getopt style? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
