Neal D. Becker wrote: > On Tuesday 17 June 2003 10:49 am, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> I've put together a plan of post-review developement of the >> program_options library --- see attachemnt. I believe it includes all >> issues raised. If anybody mage a suggestion which got lost, or has any >> opinion on the document, I'd be interested to know. >> > > Postional parameters looks like an interesting addition. I guess this is > what is commonly called "non-option arguments"?
Yep. Given all the confusion about options, parameters, and arguments, I decided the library will simply have "options" and "position options". > Will non-option arguments be able to be placed anywhere on command line, > like gnu getopt style? Yes. It's allowed even now. - Volodya _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
