Maxim Egorushkin said: > > "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Priorities are implemented, but still undergoing design changes, in >> the thread_dev branch. The timer, if I understand what you want, is >> trivial to implement portably with the current Boost.Threads >> interfaces, but I do plan on addressing this as well. > > Speaking about the timer I ment something like that: > > typedef int milliseconds; > > class stopwatch > { > public: > stopwatch() > : started_(::GetTickCount()) > {} > > milliseconds elapsed() const > { > return ::GetTickCount() - started_; > } > > private: > const DWORD started_; > };
Ahh... that's not a threading concept ;). -- William E. Kempf _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
