> -----Original Message----- > From: Gregory Colvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:42 PM > To: Boost mailing list > Subject: Re: [boost] why no strict ownership smart pointer in boost > > > > On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 14:38 America/Denver, Boost wrote: > > > I did a search in the archives and found nothing on this: > > > > Why is there no strict-ownership smart-pointer in boost? > Just curious > > to > > know what the reasons are. Thanks, > > What do want beyond what boost::scoped_ptr and std::auto_ptr provide?
Ability to be used in STL containers, and explicit transfer of ownership capabilities (e.g. *no* move-on-copy etc). Oliver _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
