Re: [boost] why no strict ownership smart pointer in boost

[Gregory Colvin]

On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 17:36 America/Denver, Schoenborn, Oliver 
wrote:
On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 14:38 America/Denver, Boost wrote:

I did a search in the archives and found nothing on this:

Why is there no strict-ownership smart-pointer in boost?
Just curious
to
know what the reasons are. Thanks,
What do want beyond what boost::scoped_ptr and std::auto_ptr provide?
Ability to be used in STL containers, and explicit transfer of 
ownership
capabilities (e.g. *no* move-on-copy etc).
So what would the copy semantics be?

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost