We have found several problems with Boost when porting our codes to IBM Power4 systems and to several Linux variants:
The first two patches (patch1, patch2) that are attached define some missing static const data members that were declared in the Boost random library but not defined. The IBM compiler complains about this. Could somebody apply these patches.
The third patch (patch3) is a workaround for operators.hpp, since the Boost PP library does not seem to work on the IBM. Is the preprocessor library really needed for that name mangling:
#define BOOST_OPERATOR2_LEFT(name) BOOST_PP_SEQ_CAT_S(1,(name)(2)(_)(left))
or couldn't the simple
#define BOOST_OPERATOR2_LEFT(name) name##2_left
be used which would make Boost more portable? If there are reasons why the PP version is preferred? If there is a reason for the PP version then could someone please apply the patch with the workaround?
Finally in the new version of graph_properties.hpp there is an #ifdef that spans three lines (line 165). Could some please make this into a one-line #ifdef. (patch4 is a crude version, what is the right "Boost" way of doing this?)
With best regards,
Matthias
patch1
Description: Binary data
patch2
Description: Binary data
patch3
Description: Binary data
patch4
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
