At 01:39 PM 8/8/2003, Martin Wille wrote: >David Abrahams wrote: >> Matthias Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >... >>> I would be interested in >>>hearing about the plans for a Boost 1.31 release >> >> >> As far as I know the CVS is in very good health at the moment. The >> only major thing I know needs to be done is to complete the >> documentation for the new iterator adaptors. I'd like to get that >> over with soon, so it isn't hanging over our heads much longer. > >In order to avoid problems to be discovered too late for fixing them >I'll list the tests that fail for many compilers/compiler versions >on Linux: > >- filesystem::operations_test >- function::sum_avg_portable >- iterator::interoperable_fail (a compile_fail test that fails, > probably not a real problem) >- math::octonion_test > math::quaternion_test >- test::errors_handling_test > >I hope that lists helps.
Assuming I'm release manager for 1.31.0, I'm going to publish explicit release criteria for key platform/compiler pairs. Basically, the release criteria will be 100% accounting for all failures on those platform/compiler pairs.
I assume that Linux/GCC will be one of those platform/compiler pairs. I need input from Linux/GCC experts as to which version of GCC should be used for the release criteria.
I see GCC 3.3.1 has just been released, and so will be switching the Windows/GCC tests to use that version. Unless anyone objects, it will be one of the Windows release criteria compilers.
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost