Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 04:11 PM 8/10/2003, Martin Wille wrote: > > >I added gcc-3.3.1 to the Linux tests for CVS HEAD. > > > >Test failures have been down to 1% for gcc versions 3.2.3 and 3.3 a > >few weeks ago. I think 3.2.3 and 3.3.1 would be good candidates for > >being release criteria. > > OK, let's use 3.2.3 and 3.3.1 as the Linux release criteria. Since > someone has to research every failure, and this is our first release > using formal criteria, we don't want to go overboard. > > >6 tests fail for 3.2.3 and 6 tests fail for 3.3.1 > > > > > > From the list I recently posted 1 failure has been fixed and > >1 failure is due to a compiler error and not considered harmful. > > > >That leaves > > > > function::sum_avg_portable > > math::octonion_test > > math::quaternion_test > > test::errors_handling_test > > > >to be fixed or to be explained. Note, all these tests fail for > >both CVS HEAD and RC_1_30_0. > > I've just installed 3.3.1 on Windows, and am getting those same four > failure plus failures from: > > date_time/testmicrosec_time_clock (runtime failure) > iterator/interoperable_fail (compile_fail test isn't failing)
That is a compiler bug, which I guess ought to be reported again. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
