Martin Wille writes:...
David Abrahams wrote:
It appears that the tagging step for Version_1_30_1 got messed up somehow. Please have a look at RC_1_30_2, which is our release candidate for Version 1_30_2, and let me know if there are any problems.
I'm not able to run the Linux regression tests on that branch.
process_jam_log fails due to an out_of_range being thrown from
basic_string::substr. Probably, some files are still missing for
the tests to work properly.
It's hard to see how that's possible, but it is
Fixed the problem. That was also the cause of the problem with RC_1_30_1.
Thanks for sorting this out!
Please try again, everybody.
The fix made to the gcc toolset regarding the use of the GXX variable should be backported to 1_30_2. Currently most of the tests fail when I use the toolsets of 1_30_2, since my setup uses the GXX variable.
Regards, m
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
