...David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, 3.4 isn't even a released compiler so As far as I'm concerned it doesn't count.
I added 3.4 only for informational purpose. There is no point in actively support a compiler that is still under development.
I'm not sure what you mean. If it doesn't say 1_30_0 in the page it's probably a test of the HEAD revision.
The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html So it should correspond to the HEAD revision. IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so this one should fail.
I wonder if the reports are swaped (the page titled 1.30.0 being the HEAD and viceversa)
No, I checked my scripts, they aren't swapped.
To clarify:
cs-Linux are the tests for cvs head. cs-Linux-1.30.0 are the tests for 1.30.0 RELEASE. cs-Linux-rc-1.30.0 are the tests for the RC_1_30_0 branch.
Regards, m
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
