David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The page is: http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-Linux.html > > So it should correspond to the HEAD revision. > > IIUC, the HEAD revision contains Jen's broken patch, so this one should fail. > > I am only concerned with RC_1_30_0 here. > I see.
> > I think that the correct patch is to revert Jens' fix. > > (go back to revision 1.9). > > > > Can you and others run a quick test to see if this fix is correct? > > RC_1_30_0 already works with GCC-3.2 work for me. > I see. I wonder what would happen with gcc3.3 and 3.3.1 without Jen's patch. Should I revert that anyway, even if it leaves those compilers unsupported? > I checked in this > patch to fix vc6/7: > Great. Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
