Trey Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

ps. On a related note: do people have pointers to documentation on
what bugs exist in stlport 4.5.3, i.e. what gcc has fixed?

FWIW...


Today we managed to get our project over to gcc-3.3.1, STLport-4.5-0119, and boost 1.30.2.

There appears to be a disconnect in how boost and STLport handle _PTHREAD vs. BOOST_HAS_PTHREAD. The workaround we used, for now, is to edit stlport/stl/_site_config.h and uncomment the line '#define _PTHREAD'.

This seems like something that should be neccesary.

Thanks to all,
Russel Hill
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to