Trey Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ps. On a related note: do people have pointers to documentation on what bugs exist in stlport 4.5.3, i.e. what gcc has fixed?
FWIW...
Today we managed to get our project over to gcc-3.3.1, STLport-4.5-0119, and boost 1.30.2.
There appears to be a disconnect in how boost and STLport handle _PTHREAD vs. BOOST_HAS_PTHREAD. The workaround we used, for now, is to edit stlport/stl/_site_config.h and uncomment the line '#define _PTHREAD'. This seems like something that should be neccesary.
Clarification: I meant to say that I thought the workaround should NOT be neccesary and that boost should build with stlport without editing _site_config.h.
Teach me to post after a long day...
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
