E. Gladyshev wrote: > --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> unless there are very solid reasons for the allocator parameter. ;-) > > I agree, but the problme is that I don't know whether I have a solid reason or not. > I have to ship my class to someone else. She might have a solid reason, I don't know. > If I supply an allocator parameter, then I am covered and I can sleep well. :)
Well... if you ask me, it is better to not offer the functionality until someone explicitly asks for it and gives a reasonable scenario as an example. Features are easy to add, hard to remove, and there is always the possibility that you "pre-included" the wrong feature. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
