But do the 'emulating' compilers also have the same pragma warning disable system?
Paul Paul A Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria, LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 Mobile +44 7714 33 02 04 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ulrich Eckhardt | Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:12 PM | To: Boost mailing list | Subject: Re: [boost] BOOST TEST and strict /Za no lanugage extensions | option -virturenot fully rewarded? | | | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- | Hash: SHA1 | | On Wednesday 03 September 2003 15:56, Paul A. Bristow wrote: | > #ifdef _MSC_VER // or BOOST_MSVC? | > #pragma warning (disable : 4511) // copy operator could not be generated | > #pragma warning (disable : 4512) // assignment operator could not be | > #endif // _MSC_VER | | In this case, BOOST_MSVC is the right one, possibly with a version. | The reason | is that other (IMO thus broken) compilers also define that symbol ... | However, I seem to remember that that is documented. If not, I'm probably | confusing this with STLport sources. | | Uli _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
