On 04/05/2020 19:30, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 5/4/20 7:20 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
None of the relevent specs (EFI, DT, EBBR) specify the GUID for passing
a DTB. Add it to the EBBR document so it is documented somewhere
relevant.
Fixes: #45
Cc: Andrei Warkentin <awarken...@vmware.com>
Cc: Francois Ozog <francois.o...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com>
---
source/chapter2-uefi.rst | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/source/chapter2-uefi.rst b/source/chapter2-uefi.rst
index f6a5802..cf2f652 100644
--- a/source/chapter2-uefi.rst
+++ b/source/chapter2-uefi.rst
@@ -86,6 +86,16 @@ tables.
- An Advanced Configuration and Power Interface [ACPI]_ table, or
- a Devicetree [DTSPEC]_ system description
+A Devicetree system description MUST be provided in Flattened Devicetree (DTB)
+format version 17 or higher.
It is not self-evident what format version 17 might refer to.
I would suggest :
A Devicetree system description MUST be provided in Flattened Device
Tree (DTB) format version 17 (described in Devicetree Specification 0.2)
or higher.
+The following GUID must be used in the EFT system table to identify the DTB.
I would not know what EFT refers to. I cannot find that term in the UEFI
spec. And it is not used in EBBR version 1.0. I suggest:
The configuration table with the Flattened Devicetree is identified by
the following GUID in the UEFI system table:
Fixed both. Thanks.
g.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
medium. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
