actually isn't device tree a 1980s design :-) anyway, as long as we can hit the things I care so much about,
self describing alignment independent endian independent names not magic numbers (I mean, you want to put a UUID in there too, fine, but I doubt a human-readable string will kill us on space) it can be anything you all think best. On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:49 PM Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 1:29 -0700, ron minnich wrote: > > >I'd rather not take HOB as a given without considering alternatives. > >It's a very 1990s design. > > Device tree is also a very early 90s design for that matter. If we are > talking about clean slate design, how about something actually new and modern > like RFC 8949? > > From a practical standpoint I don't see HOBs going away very soon but I'm > open to possibility thinking on a long term basis. > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. > View/Reply Online (#146): https://OCP-All.groups.io/g/OCP-OSF/message/146 > Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81937262/1767664 > Group Owner: ocp-osf+ow...@ocp-all.groups.io > Unsubscribe: > https://OCP-All.groups.io/g/OCP-OSF/leave/6627687/1767664/1274031919/xyzzy > [nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com] > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
