On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:03:50PM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 15:01, Vincent Stehlé <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:24:41AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Hello Ilias, hello Vincent, > > > > > > I am currently reviewing EBBR v2.4.0-pre1. > > > > > > I guess a compliant software present all four of the GUIDs so that a > > client > > > looking for a certain compliance level will hit a match. > > > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > This is my understanding as well: as far as the EBBR conformance profiles > > are > > concerned, a platform should advertise all the profiles it supports. We > > could > > certainly clarify this aspect a bit more. > > > > > I think we can already publkish all of the in U-Boot right Vincent?
Hi Ilias, I think U-Boot publishes only the 2_1 GUID for the moment. [1] Let's add some more. > At least ONELab seems to pass ACS 3.0 with u-boot 2025.10 The ACS does not take the profiles into account for the moment, but doing so is planned as far as I know. Best regards, Vincent. [1] https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/master/lib/efi_loader/efi_conformance.c > > Cheers > /Ilias _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
