Thanks for the info. I'm just checking out that section of the XEP now. How do you think xmpp4js compares to JSJaC. I was under the impression (wrongfully it seems) that xmpp4js was the older library and JSJaC was the newer one. When you say you just implemented it in xmpp4js, do you mean in the trunk or just locally?

adam


On Jul 20, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Harlan Iverson wrote:

Part of xep-0124 allows cross-domain communication though an alternative script syntax. I just implemented it in xmpp4js: http://xmpp4js.sourceforge.net . JSJaC could easily be modified to support it as well, and I can't speak for strophe. I think it took all of a dozen lines of code for mine to support it.

Openfire 3.5.2 claims to support script syntax out of the box, but I had to merge in changes from GSoC/trunk for it to work right. I can't speak for whether ejabberd supports it, but I would imagine so.

Harlan



On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Adam Pisoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So we just rolled out the BOSH version of the secret app I've been working on. We turned it on provisionally for only certain users. It's quite badass. Ajax polling is so web 2.0. Anyway, we're finding that it's literally crashing IE. There's been some talk about strophe and i'm wondering if I shouldn't try that instead of JSJaC, or whether others out there haven't had some similar issues with JSJaC.

Also, has anyone gotten JSJaC working without a proxy, via cross- site scripting hacks? We're using Nginx to proxy http-bind, and getting 411 Length Required errors when JSJaC tries to resume. We were going to use our netscaler load balancer to do the proxying, but are still trying to figure out how to do it right. Do all load balancers and routers have to be so hard to configure?

thanks,
adam



Reply via email to