I might give xmpp4js a try. JSJaC seems pretty heavy and as I
mentioned, seems to crash IE. If I give xmpp4js a try, I'll let you
know.
Thanks,
adam
On Jul 20, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Harlan Iverson wrote:
Right,
I started xmpp4js about a year ago because JSJaC didn't meet my
needs at the time. The problems I had with it were how tightly
coupled things were, and that it used string manipulation for
packets rather than DOM. It seems that the author has done a lot to
it since then and I think I remember seeing it using DOM, so I'd
imagine they are about similar now. On the other hand, xmpp4js might
be more immature; documentation is kind of sparse, it has only
really be used with Openfire, and it might not follow the spec 100%
even though it works. The only 'known' implementation using it right
now is Soashable.
The alternative script syntax is implemented in the public trunk of
xmpp4js, and is live on soashable.com.
Harlan
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Adam Pisoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the info. I'm just checking out that section of the XEP
now. How do you think xmpp4js compares to JSJaC. I was under the
impression (wrongfully it seems) that xmpp4js was the older library
and JSJaC was the newer one. When you say you just implemented it
in xmpp4js, do you mean in the trunk or just locally?
adam
