-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/2/09 8:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 10/2/09 8:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 10/2/09 8:01 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: >>> 2009/10/3 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: >>>> Although it's my impression that BOSH services are not usually served >>>> from the same domain as web services (e.g., once we deploy BOSH at >>>> jabber.org we'll probably serve it from bosh.jabber.org instead of >>>> www.jabber.org), we might want to choose a path that is unlikely to >>>> otherwise show up in the wild. That probably rules out /bosh but >>>> /httpbind might be OK since httpbind is the old shortname for the >>>> technology, as in the http://jabber.org/protocol/httpbind/ namespace. >>>> >>> If /httpbind then it may as well be /http-bind, I know at least two >>> vendors who won't have to change a thing that way :) >> I don't particularly care, but I foresee confusion between "httpbind" >> and "http-bind"... > > Despite that niggling worry, I'd be fine with "/http-bind"...
The more I think about it, the more I like "/bosh" (especially given that most BOSH CMs will be hosted at domains that are not serving normal web pages). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrJSnQACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwSTgCgo9aAJjiCHT7HvIi7pbK81l4+ g4oAniVijly6XkL+xArNP0cfAvj9RG8K =wwD6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
