On 10/05/2009 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Hi,
> The more I think about it, the more I like "/bosh" (especially given > that most BOSH CMs will be hosted at domains that are not serving normal > web pages). About what path are we talking here, the bosh path at the CM or the bosh path at the webserver serving the pages? These might be the same (eJabberd for example incorporates a webserver) or these might be different (for example a webserver like apache2 proxying to the CM). For both the paths, standardization might make configuration easier. So I am in favour. But for sandboxed clients, there might by quite a big site be hosted toghter with the CM or the proxy to the CM. So I would say: recommend both paths to /http-bind/. Winfried -- http://www.tilanus.com xmpp:[email protected] tel. +31.15.3613996 / +31.6.23303960 fax. +31.15.3614406
