> I remember talking to Uri about Stem. Looks like a nice application of
> Stem. Delegate the work to 3 different stem cells and posts the results
> to another stem to sync the results. I believe Stem works very well with
> DBI interface.

Indeed, URI mentioned doing that with 4 or 50 instances at his talk last
night. Although due to (lack of) threading, he needs multiple Stem Hubs to get
parallelism (maybe he could use Perl 5.8 to do Cells parallel in one Hub, but
he hasn't yet. Would be a fun way to explore 5.8 threads once he gets it up on
CPAN, a /t/h/r/e/a/t/ promise he repeated last night.

Using Stem::Hub to parallelize multiple DBI connections may be just the hook I
need to experiment with Stem. (At the day job I have commercial prefered
solutions in the logging, job control, messaging spaces which may not be as
elegant as stem but are actively supported by the nights & weekends operators,
so I have an active disincentive, also known as my pager, from using "new"
solutions in those spaces! ;-)

 -- bill
_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm

Reply via email to