>>>>> "BR" == Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BR> problem. In particular, I have had to use BR> no warnings 'recursion'; BR> on occasion because the implementers of perl thought it sufficiently BR> abnormal to be worth a warning if a particular function is ever entered BR> 100 times more that it has been exited. At least they also made it easy BR> to turn off. i recently had to use that as well for a maze solving program i wrote recently (anyone wanna see it? there is a procedural and an oo version). it is one of the few times where you have to know the warning will show up and you need to shut it off. rarely in real life code do you need 100 recursive calls and if you are smart enough to how to write recursive code then you know enough to disable that warning. my only other use of no warnings has been when munging the symbol table (exporting or installing accessors and the like). uri -- Uri Guttman ------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------- http://www.stemsystems.com --Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and Coding- Search or Offer Perl Jobs ---------------------------- http://jobs.perl.org _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
