Ricker, William wrote: >>CGI::App is essentially a glorified switch statement. :-) > > Randal's CGI::Prototyped is more of a full Framework CGI ... so should > be added to such a total comparison.
True. It is more fleshed out. Though as I recall, it still lacks things like sessions or authentication. More importantly, does anyone "get" Randal's CGI::Prototype? http://search.cpan.org/~merlyn/CGI-Prototype-0.9053/lib/CGI/Prototype.pm Usually Randal's recommendations or modules have a readily apparent elegance to them, but after reading an article or two and looking over the man page for CGI::Prototype, I just don't see the benefit that it brings relative to the added complexity it introduces. -Tom _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
