From: "Bill Ricker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:05:54 -0400
> But what you say about git's suitability for such a hackathon is
> right on the mark. If Andy has a git repo, then the commit history
> could be preserved after the hackathon, without needed to give everybody
> direct access. (There are also git <=> Subversion tools as well.)
Checking in the result of the hackathon as a single delta to the trunk
would be ok
Will Andy allow us to commit directly? In that case, we should try to
get everybody commit bits ASAP. I'm guessing that Google has Subversion
set up to support per-file permissions, so he only needs to grant us
access to a new branch.
If not, we will still need to arrange a shared repository far enough
in advance so that everybody can be sure that they have a compatible
client. Otherwise, getting tests to testers will be a nightmare. (I'm
still skeptical there will be enough setup time.)
-- Bob
_______________________________________________
Boston-pm mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
