On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Tom Metro <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll reiterate a prior recommendation to use Wikispaces. It's been > working fine for BLU and a few other projects with minimal maintenance > effort. (Much nicer wiki UI than kwiki, too.) If you set it to require a > login (OpenID) you pretty much eliminate spam. > > The big downside to it is that you have to pay in order to use a fully > custom domain, otherwise you get a subdomain, which you could redirect > to from your desired domain. > Tom's offer is very much appreciated. My previous reply was along the lines that we'd had so little wiki-ish authoring activity (aside from the spammers) that I doubting the conversion was worth the effort and cost, was wondering if we'd have a better fit moving to a Content Management System (such as the minimalist WEBDAV that pm.org supplies -- that Jerrad and I used on Advent 2.0 -- or something fancier, hopefully Perl based, maybe runnable where our wiki is now (Quinlan's)). For FAQ/contact pages and a monthly calender update we don't need much -- and only the few who actually do the editing need write access. That's all that's really happening now. I would like comment on those requirements -- do we need a wiki ? if so, what is who going to do with it that they haven't lately ? -- Bill @n1vux [email protected] _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
