Thanks, Roselle. I am now at 30,484 from 32,000 plus. I have not had the unit yet for a month.
At 1/15/2004, you wrote:

Nope, Paul, the information you got isn't true for my case. When I got my BN in August 2001, the value reported was at 35,000+. When I sent it in for new batteries, the reported value, like I said, was at 19,000+. And when I got it back, it was 39,996 and had stayed above 33,000 until now (it's at 33,280). If you want, tell the tech support guy you spoke to about this, a simple phone call to me can prove this.

Roselle

>----- QUOTED MESSAGE -----
>Sent by: Paul Henrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

>Hi, Roselle.  When I first got my unit, the highest I got was 32 thousand
>plus.  I was told by someone in tech support that the highest number he had
>ever seen was 33 thousand.  He told me that when putting a battery into a
>bn, if that d number was lower than 26 thousand, that that was considered a
>bad battery.
>But Mine was never near 39000.
>Mine was 32000 plus when I got it a month ago.  It now shows 31,488 and I
>have 21 percent charge left.
>In a few days, I will just have had my unit for a month.



___
To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote

Paul Henrichsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<home.pacbell.net/paulh52>



Reply via email to